有道君 知ったかぶりしないでちゃんと調べなよ。

有道ブログ　tp://www.debito.org/?p=1817

# john Says:
July 16th, 2008 at 3:40 pm

I got one question only, was the fact that the local customs officers may have/ probably planted these drugs to “test” their dogs lack of skills? would a Japanese jury believe this? or would the police/prosecutor be allowed to “accidentally lose” this info? Would the defence be allowed to enter this as evidence?

–As was exposed on Japanese TV this morning (more than three decades after the murder case mentioned went to trial), the prosecution in Japan has control over its own evidence, and can choose not to submit certain information to the judge at its own discretion. This morning, it was clear evidence that would have clearly exonerated the defendant. That is a serious problem with Japan’s judiciary.

So the answer is, as long as the defense does not have the information in the investigation (which is controlled by the police), the prosecution has an incredible advantage.

証拠開示でググるだけだろ。
証拠開示

ああ、日本語ができないのか？　そもそも調査能力がないのか？　両方なのか？

それにしても有道ブログを情報源にしている外国人が大勢いると思うと空恐ろしくなる。